Academic Registry Records Management and Related Policies in African Higher Education Institutions: An Empirical Review
| dc.contributor.author | Angela, Geoffrey | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-03-03T20:58:50Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2026 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Academic Registries in African Higher Education Institutions are central to admissions, enrolment, progression, graduation, and the integrity of educational records. However, they operate within uneven policy frameworks and resource-constrained environments. This empirical review synthesises findings from recent studies on records and registry management across African Universities to examine how Academic Registries manage student records, the extent and nature of guiding policies, and the organisational, technological, and human factors shaping practice. Evidence shows that while many institutions have developed record-keeping systems and, in some cases, formal records or registry policies, implementation is often weak, fragmented, or inconsistently applied across units, with limited national-level policy direction in several countries. Digitalisation of academic records has improved efficiency and accessibility, where adequately resourced. Still, progress is hampered by obsolete filing systems, inadequate ICT infrastructure, security and privacy concerns, and shortages of trained records personnel. Registry performance is further constrained by understaffing, insufficient professional development, and bureaucratic bottlenecks, which collectively undermine timely decision-making, student services, and institutional effectiveness. At the same time, robust records and registry practices are consistently associated with better administrative performance, organisational effectiveness, and institutional reputation, highlighting their strategic importance for quality assurance and governance. The review argues for comprehensive, context-sensitive academic registry and records management policies that clearly define roles, standards, and procedures across the records lifecycle, supported by adequate resources, capacity building, and integrated digital systems. It concludes with recommendations for harmonising institutional and national policy directives, strengthening accountability mechanisms, and pursuing further empirical research, particularly longitudinal and comparative studies on policy implementation and its impact on registry effectiveness and student outcomes in African higher education. | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Angela, G. (2026). Academic Registry Records Management and Related Policies in African Higher Education Institutions: An Empirical Review. East African Journal of Education Studies, 9(1), 713-724. https://doi.org/10.37284/eajes.9.1.4579 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.37284/eajes.9.1.4579 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://ir.lirauni.ac.ug/handle/123456789/1031 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | East African Journal of Education Studies | |
| dc.subject | Academic records | |
| dc.subject | Higher education institutions (HEIs) | |
| dc.subject | Digital academic records | |
| dc.subject | Records management | |
| dc.subject | Data security/information protection | |
| dc.title | Academic Registry Records Management and Related Policies in African Higher Education Institutions: An Empirical Review | |
| dc.type | Article |