Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOcan, MOSES
dc.contributor.authorManabe5, Yukari C.
dc.contributor.authorBaluku, Hannington
dc.contributor.authorAtukwase, Esther
dc.contributor.authorOgwal-Okeng, Jasper
dc.contributor.authorObua, celestino
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-31T06:47:39Z
dc.date.available2019-10-31T06:47:39Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationOcan, M., Manabe, Y. C., Baluku, H., Atukwase, E., Ogwal-Okeng, J., & Obua, C. (2015). Prevalence and predictors of prior antibacterial use among patients presenting to hospitals in Northern Uganda. BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology, 16(1), 26.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/123456789/76
dc.description.abstractBackground: Human antibacterial exposure occur in different ways including consumption of animal and agricultural products as well as use of prescribed and non-prescribed agents. We estimated the prevalence and explored the predictors of antibacterial use among patients presenting to hospitals in northern Uganda. Methods: Four hundred fifty (450) patients were randomly selected and antibacterial use prior to hospital visit measured using a questionnaire and urine antibacterial activity assay. Urine antibacterial bioassays were performed using American type culture collections of Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis and Streptococcus pyogenes. Data were analysed using STATA 12.0 at 95 % confidence level. Results: Of 450 patients interviewed, 62.2 % had used antibacterial agents. Urine antibacterial activity was detected in 30.4 % of the samples tested. Of the 85 patients who reported not taking any antibacterial at home, 16 (18.8 %) had urine with antibacterial activity. Most test bacteria, E. coli (74.5 %), B. subtilis (72.6 %) and S. pyogens (86.7 %) were sensitive to urine of patients who reported using antibacterial drugs before hospital visit. From the interview, metronidazole 15.6 % (70/450), amoxicillin 12 % (54/450), and ciprofloxacin 10.4 % (47/450) were the most used antibacterial agents. Patient age (OR, 2.45: 95 % CI: 1.02–5.91: P = 0.024), time-lag between last drug intake and hospital visit (OR: 3.18: 95 % CI: 1.44–7.0: P < 0.0001), and time-lag between illness onset and hospital visit (OR: 1.89: 95 % CI: 0.38–5.1: P = 0.027) predicted the use of antibacterial agents before hospital visit. Discussion: Community antibacterial use continues to take place in an unregulated manner. In addition, physiciansrarely seek to ascertain prior use of antibacterial agents among patients presenting to hospitals. This couldhave a bearing on patient treatment outcomes. Conclusion: Knowledge of prior antibacterial use among patients presenting to hospitals is useful to physicians in ensuring antibacterial stewardship.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen_US
dc.subjectAntibacterial useen_US
dc.subjectPatientsen_US
dc.subjectUgandaen_US
dc.subjectNorthern Ugandaen_US
dc.subjectUrine antibacterial bioassayen_US
dc.subjectSelf-report,en_US
dc.subjectSelf-report, Self-medicationen_US
dc.titlePrevalence and predictors of prior antibacterial use among patients presenting to hospitals in Northern Ugandaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record